Pakistan ended T20 series win



Mohammad Hafeez excels with bat and ball as Pakistan hit Zimbabwe by five runs to wrap up the two-match International Twenty20 series 2-0.

The tourists' 141 for seven seemed to set Zimbabwe an achievable target but the hosts came up short in their response, mustering 136 for seven but eventually failing to do sufficient to get over the line.

Misbah-ul-Haq won the toss and chose to bat first with opening batsman Mohammad Hafeez top-scoring with 51 from 38 balls.

The hosts reach 136 for the loss of seven wickets from their 20 overs with top-scorer Tatenda Taibu left on 37 not out, scoring three fours and one six in his 28-ball knock.

His seventh-wicket partnership with Elton Chigumbura ended when Chigumbura was dismissing for 24 runs when he was wedged by Asad Shafiq at long-on after 16.5 overs.

Hafeez was the pick of Pakistan's bowlers, taking three wickets for 11 runs in his three overs. He dismisses Zimbabwe's middle order for less than 20, as well as Hamilton Masakadza caught and bowled for just three runs.

Hafeez was also concerned in the elimination of Zimbabwean opening batsman Vusi Sibanda when he wedged him at long-on from Junaid Khan's bowling for 15.

Kyle Jarvis was the pick of Zimbabwe's bowlers when he detached Rameez Raja, Misbah-ul-Haq and Sohail Tanvir for a total of 11 runs.

But it was Zimbabwe's batsmen that unsuccessful to win the match, with only Taibu and Chigumbura scoring more than 20.

Can Kohli take on Dravid's legacy?


As one of Indian Cricket's most obedient sons walks into retirement, Virat Kohli promises to carry the baton passed by Rahul Dravid.

Often a baton-exchange in cricket takes place in full public view, even though sometimes its meaning becomes clear only much later. When Vijay Merchant broken his career with 154 against England in Delhi, the batsman at No. 3 was run out for 21.

This was Polly Umrigar, who was to carry the batting on his shoulder in the next generation.

Forty years ago, as Dilip Sardesai was moving towards the then record score of 642 in a series in the West Indies, he pointed to a younger man saying the latter was the future of Indian cricket. That 21-year-old, Sunil Gavaskar, went on to make 774 in the same series.

At Cardiff, as Rahul Dravid and Virat Kohli batted jointly, put on 170 in a one-day international, it was hard to look beyond the clear pattern. Another baton-exchange, this time in a one-day international, but it doesn’t take too much head to make bigger that to Test cricket.

It is not an abnormally Indian thing – this obligation of order as a creation prepares to bid goodbye. Australia, looking at a No. 3 to succeed Ricky Ponting has a new applicant, the young Shaun Marsh, who made a century on Test debut next to Sri Lanka recently. England’s bench strength in the series against India was so rich and varied that the senior players can feel the breath of the youngsters on their necks.

Much of the remains of the cricket season in India will now be occupied with the thought of whom after the Biggies? Or its variants. While it is generally accepted that Sachin Tendulkar, like Bhagwat Chandrasekhar before him, cannot have an correct replacement, India’s current lowly status in world cricket means that any hint that they might be able to squeeze in an infrequent square peg into a round hole, will be welcomed.

Sport is a strange creature. You don’t lose if you can find your future in the loss. As William Blake said in another context, without contraries there is no progression.

A generation and more ago, when another Fab Four – the spinners Chandrasekhar, Bishan Bedi, Erapalli Prasanna and Srinivas Venkatraghavan – retire, those who moved into their shoes had the extra pressure of not only taking wickets at the same rate but being aesthetically as pleasing and articulate to boot.

Virat Kohli, Cheteswar Pujara, Suresh Raina, Rohit Sharma and others will face a similar intolerant approach when the Tendulkars, Dravids and Laxmans move on. Their success will depend on how well they cope with this extra, and in some ways unnecessary pressure.

It is mainly difficult when the team is doing badly. As England exposed once again in Cardiff, when a team is doing well, everything it touches turns into gold. When John Bairstow inwards at the crease during the chase, the match was still India’s, but the young man bat with the self-assurance and freedom that he had captivated through some osmosis from a winning team. In 21 deliveries, he became a national hero.

Kohli brings to his game an additional aspect of team spirit – the ability to put off through osmosis the aggravation and depression that comes from defeat. His century was another reminder that he is ready for thought as a front-runner to take over from the batting greats.

The Zaheer Khan saga might have, sadly come to an end. We will know soon enough. It is difficult not to feel understanding for a team which lost ten players throughout injury on a miserable tour. Yet, should India soon ascend back to the top spot in either form of the game, the magic instant will be traced to that magic partnership between Dravid and Kohli.

Kapil slam BCCI for India's tragedy


Lack of organization between the players and BCCI was the reason why the team was shamed in the tour of England, says former captain Kapil Dev.

Kapil Dev also insists that Mahendra Singh Dhoni's men should tell the Board that they cannot compete continuously for months.

India be whitewashed 0-4 in the Test series and went down 0-3 in the five-match ODI series against England. The team failed to win a single international match on the sweltering tour.

"The BCCI should appreciate that our players are not so fit, that they can play non-stop all through the year. Just a few months after the World Cup, so many of our players are wounded which is a worrisome factor," Kapil told a TV channel.

"If the Board and the players cannot decide, then there should be some knowledgeable professionals who should finalize the amount of cricket the players need to play in a year," he said.

Kapil said the Indian teams deserve a break after the World Cup triumph.

"There was so much pressure and hype during the World Cup. It was such a big victory but our players never got a chance to relax," he said.

"They kept on playing cricket which eventually resulted in their passion also fizzle out. One should appreciate that cricket is a sport and not a normal office which they have to attend day in and day out," he rational.

Kapil also pointed out the weaknesses in the Indian team. "How can you have just four bowlers bowling 90 overs in English conditions? Things were unlike earlier when you had Sachin Tendulkar and Sourav Ganguly chipping in and giving rest to the main bowlers," he said.

"However, now it is not probable. I think that the selectors got approved away after the World Cup win. Team for a tour of Australia, South Africa or England should always be selected keeping in view the circumstances there," he added.